Home
About this Journal
A 'journal' from Joshua Taj Bozeman, the webmaster of The Blue Site (www.thebluesite.com). A 27 year old guy interested in a number of things- ranging from conservative politics to animated series for both kids and adults, filmmaking, percussion, web design, drum corps, smooth jazz, and much more...
Current Month
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
May. 9th, 2008 @ 09:16 pm Velvet Knights 1984!
Current Mood: contemplative
Current Music: Velvet Knights 1984/1992/1987
1984 VK All Night Long & NBC

Brilliant. Loved Velvet Knights back in the day. Just discovered they're touring this year (tourer last year partially). They're DIV III, I believe, and they're nowhere near the same caliber, but maybe one day...

You can argue the position of pure drum corps and no room for this sort of stuff, but you can hardly deny that these guys had some musical chops.
About this Entry
Ben Katz
May. 6th, 2008 @ 03:16 pm Writer's Block: Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep
Current Location: home- living room recliner
Current Mood: content
Current Music: fox news channel

What is one thing you MUST do before you go to bed at night?

Submitted by [info]twink


View other answers

Well, I have to put a DVD in the machine to play while I sleep (I put it on repeat). Almoat always an animated program...such as Mission Hill, Home Movies, Dr. Katz, Family Guy, Futurama, or sometimes (but less often) Doug or Hey Arnold. Sometimes I'll put an episode of Joe Schmo or About A Girl on repeat all night.

That's what I usually have to do to sleep...that and turn on the fan, because I always tend to get hot in the middle of the night even when it's 40 degrees outside.
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Jun. 21st, 2007 @ 09:29 pm Proof: The Media is Overwhelmingly Liberal
A list of 144 journalists who gave donations to political candidates or political parties...overwhelmingly, journalists give to Democrats.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19113455

If this isn't proof (NBC, I would argue, is a fairly liberal source these days) of something, then I don't know what is...
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Nov. 26th, 2006 @ 09:12 pm Beautiful People Not So Beautiful in HD
I was looking through various sites on HDTV, and I came upon these two interesting articles on how people who look halfway decent, or even really great (it's a matter of opinion, of course) don't look so great at all and sometimes look terrible in an HD broadcast.

hdtv

Phillip Swann, writing in Television Week, talks about how Cameron Diaz has very visible pockmarks from acne scars- she's just not so good to look at in HD. Other stars who have natural beauty look even better in HD, as do most younger stars...the older and not so naturally beautiful stars look even worse than usual in HD.

The second is an article on porn in HD (from slate.com). HDTV might ruin porn, some say...why? The fact is- most of these girls aren't very attractive. And worse than regular movie "actors"- these women are naked...with closeup shots of their most intimate parts. A celeb doesn't usually have to hide the acne on her backside...an adult film star doesn't have that luxury. Her flaws are there for all to see. And HD makes it a thousand times worse. The flaws stick out a mile away.

Ideas I've never pondered when thinking of high definition television...but they're issues for some- I'm guessing the young girls baring it all have it the worst.
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Nov. 7th, 2006 @ 10:41 pm Congrats America
San Francisco liberal as speaker of the house with ultra-liberal San Francisco "values." Conspicracy nut who took part in mock Bush Impeachment as the chairman of the Judiciary Jommitte. A convicted felon as the chairman of the Intelligence Committee. Ultra Liberal Charlie Rangell as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee.

An end to the Bush tax cuts. Say goodbye to your extra cash in a few years and hello to higher taxes.

Cuts in military spending. At a time when we need that spending most.

A refusal to agressively fight the war on terror. At a time when we need to be as strong as we possibly can be.

Americans will have to live with the results of their actions. I'm afraid most won't care for these results- but too many of us have become too weak to fight the war on terror, to forgetful to remember Sept 11, and just plain too ignorant of what the results will be. We push a button on a screen, most of us having no idea what we're sowing and having no clue what we will be forced to reap.
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Sep. 14th, 2006 @ 12:43 am Bruce Hornsby: Intersections
Check out Bruce Hornsby's new career retrospective box set called INTERSECTIONS 1985-2005. I need to get this set. I have all the others except A NIGHT ON THE TOWN. I like his contemporary stuff better anyhow, so no big deal...I have Real Rhapsody if I ever want to listen to that CD.

Bruce Hornsby: Intersections, 1985-2005

BUY HERE FROM AMAZON.COM
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Aug. 28th, 2006 @ 11:23 pm My Current Netflix DVD's
I upgraded my Netflix account from 2 movies unlimited to 4 movies unlimited. So, I can have 4 movies out at any time and unlimited rentals every month. With 2, waiting for your next two meant a lag in time where you actually had a DVD to watch. With 4, that shouldn't be a problem.

Anyhow, here are the movies I have at home right now...

HAUNTED HIGHWAY [Japanese/American horror film]
DIAS DE FUTBOL [Spanish comedy]
HA TUM JAANO NA HUM [Indian/musical]
PULSE (2001) [Japanese horror film]

Too bad I've had PULSE since March!! I need to get on top of that one, get it out of the way and sent back...
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Aug. 27th, 2006 @ 03:28 am Dish Network HD
So...I have a 27" TV. It's standard definition, and I've had it for over 10 years. I have digital cable with all the channels and a dual tuner DVR cable box. It holds, I think, around 30 hours of programming. A little small of a hard drive for my tastes, but whatever...

So, I've decided I want to save some from each paycheck and buy an HDTV. At least 42" and limiting myself to $1, 700 max. I could go a bit higher to accomodate the taxes. I was just planning on upgrading to my cable company's HD packahe for $12 a month more and $5 more for the HD DVR box. I was looking for information on HDTV's- trying to a find a nice one at 42" with a stand, as I have no way of mounting it on the wall, the way this room is set up. I was searching through some stuff and saw someone mentioning VOOM- a service I've known about for years.

VOOM HDTV service

Well, I forgot about this, but my google search helped spark the memory that VOOM was bought by DISH Network. I never liked DN before- I was always a Direct TV kind of guy. I had Direct TV for about 3 or 4 years a while back, and I loved it. That was before DVR and HDTV tho, so it's even better now, as I know just from watching it at the local Best Buy, going thru all the spanish language channels, as well as the asian channels and much more...

I went to the DISH site and they have the VOOM HD channels (they look very promising)...plus they have FOOD Network and HGTV in HD and many others I never knew even went out in HD format to begin with. I called their 800 number and got all the information, and the pricing isn't too bad. It's actually really good if you ask me.

With DISH- the lady told me, according to my address, that my location had a view of their sats in the sky...so, no problems there. She gave me the pricing, the information, etc. The initial fee for the DVR HD box and the activation is $250. With the HD DVR, the DVR fee of $5 a month is waived. With this, I think you're just leasing the box...you don't own the equipment, but that's not a problem. The installation, the wiring into the house, the connections, etc. is included in this one time fee. Also, the dish itself with the dual LNB is included. I found out that the HD DVR is, indeed, a dual tuner DVR with PIP, and it holds up to 300 hours of standard definition programming or 30 hours of HD programming. Very nice.

They have a package called HD Platinum which includes all their HD channels plus all their standard def channels as well. Here is the HD lineup they offer:

Showtime HD
Starz HDTV
HBO HD
Animania HD
Family Room HD
GamePlay HD
Discovery HD Theater
Equator HD
National Geographic Channel HD
DISH Network PPV in HD
Film Fest HD
Food Network HD
HDNet Movies
Kung Fu HD
Monsters HD
World Cinema HD
HDNews
Rave HD
ESPN HD
ESPN2 HD
NFL Network HD
Rush HD
WorldSport HD
Gallery HD
HDNet
HGTV HD
TNT HD
Treasure HD
Ultra HD
Universal HD

Not too shabby, I'd say.

So, that package is a total of $104 a month plus $5 if you want your local channels, but you can catch those off air, so no need for them really. The lady I talked to said that the first 3 months are charged at $93, but that after the installation and payment of $250 for that installation and the service activation fee, you pay $210 for 2 months in advance...after that, it's $104 a month every month for all that HD goodness. Weird thing- the cable bill is a bit more than this without any HD channels.

So, I'd have to basically have $500 to start it all- the installation and activation plus the first 2 months of service. It seems like a lot, but with them coming out to install the dish, free wiring to bring it into the house, sealant for the connection they make, etc. It's not all that bad. Sweet, in fact. Very sweet.

42 inch Sanyo HDTV

Too bad I need the TV first and a TV stand to sit it on. I'll almost surely go with a Wal-Mart TV. They have a nice looking 42" Sanyo for $1, 500- only problem is, it looks like it's wall-mountable only...which won't work. Will have to find out if you can place it on a stand. I priced those, and Wal-Mart has a number of decent stands for around $100 and less...with places for the DVD players, DVD recorder, stereo receiver, the center channel speaker, the 25 disc CD changer, and the 2 VCR's.

I'll update this topic in a few months when I actually get the TV and the service. Let everyone know how it goes, how the service is, all of that good stuff.
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Jul. 6th, 2006 @ 10:06 pm (no subject)
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/431172p-363418c.html

http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2006/06/uc-santa-cruz-denice-dee-denton-san.html
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Jun. 22nd, 2006 @ 02:35 pm Superman Looks Like a Sissy
I'm not big on superhero movies in general. I saw Batman way back in 89, I think it was, but I was a kid...I never saw Spiderman- Toby Maguire fighting anybody is just a joke- he's way too sissy to be super-anything. I'm trying to think of other "superhero" flicks, but all I can think of is XMEN, and I've never seen any of those movies either. Animated superhero stuff is okay- I liked Justice League a lot, but when it comes to live action movies based on superheroes, they all come off as sissy.

The best case of this is with this new Superman. He looks like the world's biggest sissy who has some odd fetish for wearing tights and a huge cape that makes his already smallish frame look ever smaller and wimpier. I might go see Superman Returns just because I like IMAX versions of movies, but it's hard to say if I will like it at all.

Check out the pictures below, and tell me that live action Superman just doesn't cut it. I went to a couple comics message boards and even IGN where they discussed the new costume for this movie, and I see that many people think this guy cast as Superman looks way too wimpy and that the costume is all wrong. Not all agree and think he looks totally "badass", of course, but here's my take.

Check out Superman as shown here from The Justice League.

Superman from Justice League

This guy is BUILT. He's definitely SUPER in all aspects. The thing about animation and comics is that he doesn't look like he's wearing tights at all. He just looks like natural- like the suit was made for him and he was made for it. Seriously- why, in live action versions, does ANY superhero wear tights? What villian in his right mind would be frightened by some dude in tights? Tights, for heaven's sake! Anyhow- this superman just works. He looks "super," he looks like he could take on bad guys, he doesn't look at all sissy or wimpy.

Now, take a look at two pictures of the new superman from Superman Returns.

Superman from Superman Returns

Superman from Superman Returns

He's just not super. He looks small. He looks sissy...he's wearing tights and wimpy looking boots that look like they were taken from some hobbit movie. I see him with his cape swinging behind him, and he actually looks like a hobbit who escaped from Lord of the Rings. Tell me he doesn't look like a total girlie-man!

Can someone tell me why on earth his S logo is so tiny? And why does it look like he's wearing a tiny speedo? Those are definitely what you call "short shorts!" Finally- if you notice, even the Justice League version of Superman has the curly hair hanging down in the front...Superman Returns is the same deal. But, for me, in live action that big curl just looks sissy itself. I admit it looks sort of sissy even in the comic and animated version, but it doesn't look as bad as on a real actor. I never understood why on earth Superman, being a superhero and all, looks like he just came from the nerd convention in that his hair is plastered to his skull in the 'I just won the science fair' look, while at the same time he's got that sissy curly lock hanging down like he just left the salon and asked the gayest stylist to make him look as girlish as possible.

I think, with this new film, the casting was terrible. The costume is terrible. The idea to keep using a smallish guy in tights as a superhero is still a bad idea. In the end, Superman is a sissy. Face it.
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Jun. 21st, 2006 @ 02:32 am New Videogame Blog
This is cross-posted at my website, www.thebluesite.com- some of the info. in it relates directly to that URL.

--------------------------
You may have noticed at the top, I have a link to my LiveJournal, my MySpace profile, and the Christian Blog I write. I decided to also add a link to a new video game blog I'm starting, and I want to see if I can get some writers for it. A team effort. I might change the URL of the blog, and I might just change it to where I host it myself. I'd have to do a 3rd install of WordPress, but that shouldn't be too much of a hassle, I don't think. In the end, it will probably be hosted here on my own site. I don't want to have to rely on other companies to stay in business, keep things free and ad free, etc.

If you're interesting in writing for the video game blog, E-Mail me at josh@thebluesite.com or comment here saying you want to take part (or both if you want.) I will have to set up the final blog and the URL for it (probably http://www,thebluesite.com/videogameblog or something to that effect.) You can write about new games coming out, your favorite games from the past and current games...video game-related films, books, and other merchandise. Anything and everything related to video games- even the consoles, reviews for new consoles, new add-ons, new gear, and PC-related stuff as well.

Hope to hear from some of you soon...
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Jun. 20th, 2006 @ 03:23 am (no subject)
Like I always tells people- I would describe myself simply as a "Reagan conservative." It doesn't show up in the charts below...but, in this test, if you clicked famous people, my dot landed right on top of Reagan, slightly to the left (left of the screen- more "Republican") of Bush.

You are a

Social Conservative
(20% permissive)

and an...

Economic Conservative
(65% permissive)

You are best described as a:

Strong Republican




Link: The Politics Test on Ok Cupid
Also: The OkCupid Dating Persona Test
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Jun. 16th, 2006 @ 08:08 pm Deport the Stupid
Lawsuit Targets KFC's 'Killer' Cooking Oil

Susan Jones, CNSNews.com

The Center for Science in the Public Interest, the group that serves up scares about the food we eat, is suing the parent company of KFC over the type of cooking oil the fast-food chain uses to fry its chicken. KFC uses partially hydrogenated oil, which CSPI describes as a "chemically altered, trans-fat-laden oil that kills roughly 50,000 Americans per year." In a message on its website, CSPI said the class-action suit against Yum! Brands, filed Tuesday in D.C. Superior Court, seeks a court order prohibiting KFC from using partially hydrogenated oil. At the very least, the activist group wants signs posted in KFC outlets notifying customers that KFC foods are high in trans fat. "Grilled, baked, or roasted chicken is a healthy food -- and even fried chicken can be trans-fat-free," said CSPI Executive Director Michael F. Jacobson. "But coated in breading and fried in partially hydrogenated oil, this otherwise healthy food becomes something that can quite literally take years off your life. KFC knows this, yet it recklessly puts its customers at risk of a Kentucky Fried Coronary."
---------------------------

JOSH'S TAKE:

Okay...can we please deport these idiots at this so-called center for "science"? Please? I mean, come on! They want to scare people to death in thinking that KFC will kill them? They're telling blatant lies- KFC doesn't kill people, nor does the fat they speak of...MANY factors go into deaths that are partly to blame on high fat content, lack of exercise, and much more. You can hardly ever pinpoint one single factor...and your genetics, your overall environment, etc. come into play as well, for sure.

KFC should be required to tell people the obvious- that fried fast food isn't the healthiest thing to eat on the planet? Golly- what's next...we'll demand businesses that sell chemicals to post signs for their customers not to drink the dangerous chemicals? Wait- the bottles probably already have warnings that say something about "not a food product" or "do not ingest contents."

Stupidity is running rampant...when we get stupid people like these fools saying stupid things, can't we just deport them, so we no longer have to deal with their insanity?
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Jun. 15th, 2006 @ 05:58 am RFK Jr is Insane
RFK, in the new Rolling Stone, is claiming the Republicans stole the state of Ohio in the last presidential election in 04. What's his proof of this? Well, he says that exit polls shows Kerry leading...and that exit polls are never ever wrong, thus- since exit polls are never wrong and they showed Kerry winning, Bush must have stolen it.

This guy is just out of his mind insane with laughable claims like this.

He goes on to claim that there's NO doubt there was a concerted effort by high level Republican officials who stole the election...and then he says that the media refuses to cover it, hinting that they don't care. This guy- is he living in the same country I am? The same planet, even? The media, for the most part, cannot stand Bush and would follow this story till they die if there was ANY evidence to back up these completely unfounded and frankly embarassing claims RFK Jr. makes. 350, 000 votes he says were stolen...he claims that a high level Republican in Ohio has come forward and said he participated in a campaign to rig the recount (too bad no one on earth can get ahold of this imaginary official), and he also claims the company that ran the recount tabulation machines admitted they rigged the vote and stole the election. Too bad my google search shows no press release or anything from this company admitting any such thing. Again, we have to ask the nutty Kennedy to produce some evidence, just an iota of evidence, to back up these bogus, partisan claims.

Even Senator John Kerry says he has no evidence that Ohio was stolen- if it was stolen, you know he'd be doing something about it. He did nothing about it. Why? Because HE himself has no evidence whatsoever to think that anything was rigged or stolen. The DNC looked into the matter as well and found no evidence of any wrongdoing, no concerted effort to rig the vote, no stealing of elections, etc.

This is what the Mystery Pollster says of Kennedy's "evidence" in regards to exit polls:

Late last week, Rolling Stone published an article by Robert Kennedy, Jr. that asks provocatively, "Was the 2004 Election Stolen?" While it covers many topics involving alleged suppression and fraud in Ohio, the article disappoints in its discussion of the exit poll controversy, because on that aspect of the controversy Kennedy manages to dredge up nearly every long-ago discredited distortion or half-truth on this subject without any acknowledgement of contrary arguments or the weaknesses in his argument.

Even the liberal website salon.com says that Kennedy is completely wrong and that Ohio wasn't stolen. Here's the first paragraph from their story:

Whatever his aim, RFK Jr. does not appear intent on fixing the problem. He's more content to take us through a hit parade of the most popular, and the most dismissible, theories purporting to show that John Kerry won Ohio, theories that have been swirling about the blogosphere ever since the race was called. I scoured his Rolling Stone article for some novel story or statistic or theory that would prove, finally, that George W. Bush was not the true victor. But nothing here is new. If you've spent time on Democratic Underground or have read Mark Crispin Miller's "Fooled Again," you're already familiar with everything Kennedy has to say.

The Washington Post covered the story in late 2004 and concluded that the election wasn't stolen or rigged.

Michael O'Grady, the chief Democratic attorney in Ohio had this to say on the issue of a possible stolen election in Ohio:

“That point of view relies on the assumption that the entire Republican Party is conspiratorial and the entire Democratic Party is as dumb as rocks. And I don’t buy that.”

So, another Kennedy and another day of nonsensical rants backed by absolutely zero evidence. What a shocker.

And worse...

Why do Kennedys always get a pass for being maybe the most embarassing family in this country? They can make the most outrageous claims on earth and get a pass...they can drown women in cars they wreck while drunk and get away with it, they can drive drunk into police cars in DC and the cops give them a friendly ride- not to jail, but to their homes (when they can figure out which home is actually theirs!)

The Kennedys are a stain on American history, and I for one wish they'd all go away. Teddy is the biggest Kennedy nut, but let's face it, Jr. isn't too far behind.
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Jun. 8th, 2006 @ 05:48 am al-Zarqawi Killed in US Airstrike in Iraq
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi killed by US airstrike

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Al Qaeda leader in Iraq, has been killed in an airstrike on a safehouse in Iraq yesterday (US time).

I wish this brutal murderer luck in hell.
About this Entry
Ben Katz
Jun. 7th, 2006 @ 02:26 pm Crooks and Liars, Indeed
CrooksAndLiars, an extreme left wing Bush-hating website has posted that Neil Cavuto misrepresented Michael Moore's film before interviewing Sgt Peter Damon, who is suing Moore for using a clip of him in his film. A clip of Damon at Walter Reed was used in the film without Damon knowing. It was actually a segment from NBC Nightly News, in which they were talking about brand new pain-blocking medications used...Damon being one of the first soldiers at the hsopital to get the medication.

Damon appeared in the films Michael Moore Hates America and Fahrenyhype 911. He made the same complaints as he does on Cavuto in both of these films.

The clip that was used on Cavuto is snipped just to show the setup and Peter Damon's part. The entire clip from the film runs 47 seconds...the snipped clip for Cavuto runs 17 seconds. Now, anyone who knows TV knows that everything is run on a very tight schedule. So tight that most cable nets run on a system of hard breaks- breaks where the automation system goes to break at a certain second no matter what...often times, cutting off the host in midsentence if they run over on time. This assures that all commercials are played in the proper order and all are fit into each break. Some companies will only advertise on particular shows- meaning that if you have a soft break (where the automation isn't in use), you can easily run over and lose time to run the commercial set to run. If you miss a commercial, you violate the contract, and you have to find a spot in the schedule to 'make up' the missed spot.

The 'make up' spot has to fit in with the paramaters of the contract- (ie, it has to run during the particular show the company bought time for on a particular day, particular time of day, etc.)

Point is- TV runs on a tight schedule. Usually, a 1 hour block is broken into many sections. Most "1 hour" shows run around 40-45 mins depending on the network and the show. The remaining time is advertisement time that allows the show to stay on the air.

So- we know Cavuto only has a certain amount of time to get the clip in, set up the segment, interview the guy, and then close it all out. So, cutting 30 seconds off the time is a big thing. The entire interview itself runs around 5 mins and 22 seconds. Cutting out 30 seconds is actually a lot for such a small span of time.

Now...onto the snipped part of the clip. In the Cavuto clip, Sgt Damon is directly followed by Jim Moran who claims that we left many soldiers behind. Clearly, this make it look as tho Damon is one of the soldiers Moran was speaking of- one of those that were left behind in Iraq. It's not fair to Damon to be used in this manner- the film is anti-war, anti-Iraq war, and very anti-Bush...rationally, most would think that anyone appearing in the film is sharing this view. Why else would they agree to appear in a film by a radical left-wing filmmaker named Michael Moore?! Of course, Damon never gave permission to be used in Moore's film and is disgusted by the fact that he appears in the film. That's all fair.

Is Cavuto's treatment of it fair?

In the entire clip, from F11, it's the quote from Moran, then two soldiers who have negative things to say from Walter Reed followed by Damon, as he appeared in Cavuto's clip.

The entire clip actually BOLSTERS Damon's claims of Moore portraying him as anti-war and against the commander in chief! The edited clip in NO WAY changed the tone, context, or focus of the clip overall. Nothing is misrepresented at all.

Here is what the first two soldiers before Damon have to say. Again, if you read this, you will see that it actually bolsters Damon's complaint:

  • Jim Moran speaks on camera about soldiers being left behind.

  • First wounded soldier at Walter Reed soldier:

    “To say that were forgotten- no. I know were not forgotten, but missed? Yes. Yes. Ya know, Theres a lot of soldiers that have been missed.” ya know, theyve been skipped over…umm that didnt get the proper coverage they deserved.”

    Obviously, he was speaking in a negative manner about the issue. This clip CLEARLY made him appear as if he had a major problem with the way he was being treated, claiming that the military and or media have skipped over them and didn’t give them the proper coverage.

  • The next wounded soldier tries to claim the government (we can assume he’s speaking of the government, as the entire film claims that the government lied, not the MEDIA.) He says this:

    “They have a death total, but they [sic] not showing the amount of people that are being injured or being aputated because of their injuries.”

  • Next is Sgt Damon’s clip from Cavuto…


  • As you can clearly see- the two soldiers removed do nothing to change anything about the clip. I take that back, as I already said, if you add the two soldiers and play the entire 50 second clip, you get a better idea that Damon's complaint is honest. You see him even more as a victim of Moore's use of his likeness as showing him as bitter, or anti-war, or against Bush.

    The Bush-haters at crooksandliars need to get their facts straight and get a clue. The only liars I see are those who are bogusly attacking Cavuto.
    About this Entry
    Ben Katz
    Jun. 5th, 2006 @ 06:39 am Thoughts On Mom
    So, it's my parent's anniversary...35 years, I think. But, there's only one parent alive and no celebration. Today was supposed to be the start of my dad's week vacation from the post office...he and mom were planning on going somewhere for their anniversary. A local trip of some sorts- I'm not totally sure.

    That won't be happening...instead, the poor guy is off to work at 6:10. On the dot...as, I heard noise upstairs, went up there and saw him heading off in his truck.

    So, this is my first day alone with no one else in the house. It wasn't supposed to be this way. I'm supposed to go upstairs and see mom sitting on the couch, maybe sleeping, maybe not...asking me to go to McDonald's for her to get her a breakfast sandwich. Maybe Arby's...I picked up one of their sandwiches on two occasions and she liked them a lot. I went upstairs and noticed a bunch of stuff in their room- all her nail polish bottles, bills marked "paid" in her handwriting...all so recent. A mere 13 days ago she was here and kicking, and now I'm still in the stage where it feels like a dream. This isn't real. Someone isn't here one day and gone forever the next.

    I live in their house...in a basement apartment. I've never had a home away from home, unless you count this away from home...which means, this was a woman I saw nearly everyday of my life for 27 years. My best friend in the world- a woman I could talk to about anything. I could call her from work when I had all my stuff finished just to say hi, ask her if she had eaten (making sure she was feeling well and getting enough to eat and being able to make herself something, if no one else was home.) I could call her before I left work to let her know I wasn't coming straight home (she worried like crazy about all of her kids, always did, and I mean always.) I heard the phone yesterday at work, and for a split second, I forgot she's gone, and I expected to hear her on the other end of the phone asking me this or that...where is this, I wanted to mention this to you before I forgot, I wanted to let you know that we had this or that for dinner, so you won't have to stop on your way home to get anything yourself. Of course, the voice wasn't there on the other end. And it never will be again.

    I prayed the night of her death to God...I prayed to the Lord for peace in knowing that it was okay- that this was just a stage in the mystery of life, that I would see her again in time, and that she was waiting in one of the rooms of the Father's house as Christ promised. He went and made a place for all of us who believe in him, and that goes for good ol' mom as well. Of course, there are disagreements as to when a person goes to be there- I tend to think, from my reading, that a person goes to a place of peace or just rest with nothing until Christ returns to bring the dead to life, all of us having our new, glorified bodies that will last forever in heaven. So, I think she's in slumber, but it won't seem like that to her- in the same sense that when you have surgery you don't have a sense of time, neither will you in this situation. You will feel like you went into darkness for a moment and woke up into a world filled with eternal light- light, not from the sun or any other star, but pure unending light from the Father himself. In a sense, she's in no slumber at all, because time will pass in an instant in this state.

    So, dad is off to work- back to work after nearly 2 weeks off. Back to work on the day he was supposed to START his time off...on a day that is a celebration of their wedding vows. She wanted to renew them, but clearly never got the chance. This was supposed to be a very different week, indeed, but you can't know the future, and sometimes the future holds things we don't expect.

    Like I said- I prayed for peace, and in a way I got it. I still feel sort of like this isn't real, but at the same time, I just think of her, the memories of all our time together, her dreams, goals, fears, favorite this and that and feel calm. She's into a realm where I cannot yet go, but someday...

    Tomorrow will mark 2 weeks. It feels like an eternity, while at the same time it feels like a mere instant. Contradictory feelings, but not-so-contradictory in the end maybe.

    She was my rock...27 years, maybe 3 months total without seeing her. I will go upstairs later (after some rest for work tonight- never could fall asleep last night), and I won't see her. But, I'll see all the things that remind me of her. Which is both good and bad...calming and painful. It feels like she's right here with me. I really feel this is the peace I so enerstly prayed for. Life isn't always fair...in fact, it's often quite unfair, and half the time it doesn't make sense. But, tomorrow is another day. Another day to remember her, to celebrate her life, another day to cherish my memories of her and the many things we did together over nearly 3 decades...one day closer to seeing her again. In time all will be made right, and in the end- that promise is all that matters. My Father's house has lots of rooms, my mother will be in one of them. I just hope she doesn't take too long to answer the door when I come knocking.
    About this Entry
    Ben Katz
    Jun. 5th, 2006 @ 05:25 am O'Reilly VS DA Defending Incompetent Judge
    O'Reilly has good reason to be pissed
    (DOWNLOAD VIDEO- 6MB WMV file)

    READ MORE about this in my previous post on this issue...
    About this Entry
    Ben Katz
    Jun. 5th, 2006 @ 05:25 am O'Reilly Gets Feisty on Incompetent Judges
    UPDATE: Sorry for taking so long...I got tied up with things, but I uploaded the video into a new post here. Here's the direct link to the video itself. [video approx 6 MB in .wmv format]

    O'Reilly was pissed tonight. PISSED. He talked to a friend of the judge who refused to sentence a child molestor to any prison time. I need to get the video on the rerun at 3AM (central) to get all the names, the judge, the former DA who was on and defended her tonight...

    This DA was ridiculous. He waved off the affidavit as if it was nothing, and then he acted like he was clueless as to the facts in the case. The man in this case ADMITTED he molested a 13 yr old girl NUMEROUS times. The sworn statement says he confessed to doing this 5 times, but there were only 2 or 3 counts for some reason. The DA on the show kept saying he only did it 2 times and that it doesn't matter what an affidavit said about 5 times...and that the prosecutor didn't ask for jail time, so that it was okay that the judge didn't order jail time. Of course, this points to the great chance of an incompetent DA- you don't allow a sex offender off merely because a DA might be bad at his or her job.

    What was revealing was the text on the screen when the DA talked- it mentioned that he is friends with this judge (she's a woman), that he has known her for over 33 years and that he went to law school with her. O'Reilly is big on these child sex offense cases and is demanding states put tougher penalties in place. I applaud him for that.

    I will try to get the video uploaded later tonight or sometime tomorrow...it's good stuff.
    About this Entry
    Ben Katz
    Jun. 5th, 2006 @ 04:19 am Seals for Better Employment Opportunities
    poor seals...fewer jobs in the circus means longer unemployment lines
    Poor little fella.
    About this Entry
    Ben Katz